Select a name to see it on the map. Open a profile to see every fact and source.
What the source marks mean Each mark shows what kind of source backs a fact. Open the fact to read the source, the date it was checked and any conditions.
The provider's own documentation supports this fact, for the product, plan and date stated.
The provider says this, for example on a marketing page. Read the linked source and its conditions before you rely on it. ETHORITY's assessment, based on the linked sources.
An independent source supports this one fact, within the scope stated. Check the other facts separately. Figures marked 'Scenario' are calculated from stated assumptions. Results measured in practice are shown separately.
Documents, Workflow & Agents Dify is a source-available platform for visually building LLM chat apps, agents and workflows with knowledge bases, Marketplace model and tool plugins, human-input pause nodes, run cloud-hosted or self-hosted.
Per workspace /mo ○ Conditions apply – open for details Your region (Ent.) ○ Conditions apply – open for details LD Dify
LangGenius (Dify) · Platform
Facts, sources and conditions Dify is a source-available platform for visually building LLM chat apps, agents and workflows with knowledge bases, Marketplace model and tool plugins, human-input pause nodes, run cloud-hosted or self-hosted.
Where it sits on the map · 1 · 1 Build and run LLM agents and workflows (cloud or self-hosted)
Task classification by ETHORITY; match it to your intended use.
Per workspace per month (monthly or annual), with message-credit, member, app and knowledge quotas
Enterprise: contact sales, no price
Sandbox free (200 message credits); Professional $59/workspace/month or $590/year (3 members, 5,000 credits/month); Team $159/workspace/month or $1,590/year (50 members, 10,000 credits/month); taxes extra
Unit: USD (shown as $) currency code not named on page
Dify Cloud region not named ("in our managed cloud region"); Enterprise: Dify-managed single-tenant cluster "in your region" or customer-managed in own AWS/GCP/Azure account; privacy policy lists processing in US, Australia, Canada, China, EEA and UK
Cloud wording from https://dify.ai/pricing/dify-cloud; processing locations from https://dify.ai/legal/privacy-policy (website servers 'located in the United States'). No named EU region for Dify Cloud
Not used for training: "We do not train AI models ourselves, and we will not use your AI interaction data for model training."
With own API key, training depends on customer's agreement with that model provider; sub-processors 'prohibited from using your data for model training'
Model providers, tools, data sources and MCP integrations installable from the Dify Marketplace or self-built
SOC 2 Type II (attestation, auditor Sensiba); ISO 27001:2022 (assessed by Johanson); scope boundary not stated
Where the provider's own sources disagree The provider’s own sources say different things here. The trust centre names SOC 2 Type 1; the March 2026 blog and enterprise page name Type II. Confirm the applicable report.
Human Input web-app delivery not available in Trigger-started workflows; request closes after first response; default 3-day timeout; upload caps (e.g. 15 MB documents); Sandbox log history 30 days
plan limits from https://dify.ai/pricing/dify-cloud
Documents, Workflow & Agents Dust lets company teams build shared AI agents over connected knowledge sources and tools, choosing among 20+ models per task, with stake-level approvals before agents take actions like sending email.
Per seat/mo + credits ○ Conditions apply – open for details "Host in the EU or US t… ○ Conditions apply – open for details Facts, sources and conditions Dust lets company teams build shared AI agents over connected knowledge sources and tools, choosing among 20+ models per task, with stake-level approvals before agents take actions like sending email.
Gmail action approvals follow the tool guide; the model count follows the pricing page. Confirm settings for each enabled tool.
Where it sits on the map · 1 · 1 Build team AI agents over company knowledge and tools
Task classification by ETHORITY; match it to your intended use.
Per seat per month with monthly credit allowance (Pro 8,000, Max 40,000 credits per seat/month); programmatic usage $0.01 per credit; Enterprise workspace-pooled credits
Credits reset each billing period, no rollover; overage capped by admin
Free €0 (500 lifetime credits); Pro €24 per seat/month billed yearly; Max €120 per seat/month billed yearly; excl. VAT; Enterprise on quote
Unit: EUR per seat per month Where the provider's own sources disagree The provider’s own sources say different things here. Business plans for teams up to 100 people; yearly toggle 'Save 20%'. Page meta description gives $24/$120 (currency inconsistency on same page)
"Host in the EU or US to meet your regulatory needs"; US and EU data residency on Business and Enterprise; single-tenant deployment Enterprise only
Ask which cloud region and hosting provider apply to your account.
Not used for training: "Your data is never used to train models."; "No data is stored by third-party model providers."
Enterprise page: "Zero model training on your data"
Connections, MCP servers, Open API; named: Notion, Slack, Salesforce, GitHub, Gmail, Outlook, Zendesk; homepage "70+ connectors"; Business plan up to 3 connectors and 5 remote MCP servers, Enterprise unlimited
Where the provider's own sources disagree The provider’s own sources say different things here. Inconsistent counts across own pages: pricing 'Connectors to 20+ sources' vs homepage '70+ connectors' (https://dust.tt/)
Provider claim: "GDPR Compliant & SOC2 Type II Certified. Enables HIPAA compliance." No auditor, scope or report period on pages read
SOC 2 is an attestation; GDPR and HIPAA are laws. Confirm the report's scope and period.
"Dust is not designed for bulk email campaigns"; "send_mail is disabled by default on existing workspaces"; Business plan capped at 3 connectors, 5 Spaces, teams up to 100
Plan caps from https://dust.tt/home/pricing
RA Relevance AI Relevance AI · Platform
Documents, Workflow & Agents According to Relevance AI: “Subject-matter experts can use Relevance to design powerful AI agents without relying on developer resources.”
Plan + actions/credits ● Conditions apply – open for details AU · US · EU/UK ● Conditions apply – open for details RA Relevance AI
Relevance AI · Platform
Facts, sources and conditions According to Relevance AI: “Subject-matter experts can use Relevance to design powerful AI agents without relying on developer resources.”
Where it sits on the map · 1 · 1 No-code builder for AI agents and multi-agent workforces
Task classification by ETHORITY; match it to your intended use.
Subscription per plan with monthly Actions and Vendor Credits allowance; top-ups $80 per 1,000 Actions and $20 per 10,000 Vendor Credits; BYOK skips Vendor Credits
Base-plan Actions reset at renewal; purchased top-ups roll over
Pro $29/month ($19/month annual), 2,500 Actions/month, 2 build users; Team $349/month ($234/month annual), 7,000 Actions/month, 5 build users, 45 end users; Enterprise custom
Unit: USD per month Where the provider's own sources disagree The provider’s own sources say different things here. Contradictions: website pricing page https://relevanceai.com/pricing shows only Enterprise ('Talk to sales'); docs pricing gives Vendor Credits as $20/$70 per month in plan details but 10,000/35,000 per month in comparison table; plans doc example gives Pro 3,000 Vendor Credits
Regions: Australia (Sydney), US (N. Virginia), EU/UK (London); region "chosen at signup" and cannot be changed after org creation
EU option is London (UK), not an EU-27 region named; primary cloud host not named
Not used for training: company does not train any models on customer data; metadata may be used to improve features like search
Exception stated for partnership agreements. OpenAI/Anthropic listed as not logging or training on data, DPAs available
"2,000+ Integrations" (pricing); "1,000+ apps" (enterprise page); Slack and email escalation tools; OTEL & Delta Share export
Where the provider's own sources disagree The provider’s own sources say different things here. Count inconsistent between own pages (https://relevanceai.com/enterprise says 1,000+)
Provider claim: "SOC2 Type II compliant"; reports available to Enterprise customers under NDA; auditor and period not named
SOC 2 is an attestation; GDPR is a law. Confirm scope and issuer of any certificate.
Data region cannot be changed after org creation; Free plan "retired for new signups and existing accounts"; retention deletion "is permanent and cannot be undone"; approval tasks "remain in a pending state until approved or rejected"
Collated from security, pricing (https://relevanceai.com/docs/get-started/pricing), data-retention and approvals docs
WO Workato Genies Workato · Agent
Documents, Workflow & Agents According to Workato: “Workato Genies go beyond traditional AI agents – they can be customized with unique KPIs”
Per Genie action ● Conditions apply – open for details EU in-region option ● Conditions apply – open for details WO Workato Genies
Workato · Agent
Facts, sources and conditions According to Workato: “Workato Genies go beyond traditional AI agents – they can be customized with unique KPIs”
Where it sits on the map · 1 · 1 Prebuilt and custom AI agents on an integration platform
Task classification by ETHORITY; match it to your intended use.
"Workato measures Genie usage in Genie actions"; each input prompt = one Genie action; recipe steps billed as Tasks, IDP as Pages. Self-service plans bill in Workato credits
Two unit systems in own docs: Genie actions (Agent Studio pricing) vs single 'Workato credits' unit (https://docs.workato.com/en/pricing/self-service/self-service). FAQ: Genies "available to customers on specific pricing plans"
Workato Free: one-time 50,000 credits; Workato Pro: $75 (2,500 credits/month), $100 (3,500), $275 (10,000), $780 (30,000), $1,275 (50,000) per month; Enterprise priced separately
Unit: USD per month Self-service page does not name Genies/Agent Studio explicitly; currency shown as '$' only; Genie pricing for Enterprise not published
Genies available in US, EU, AU, SG, JP data centers; Genie models hosted in US, EU, APAC regions and respect residency "where possible"; EU data center: "All LLM calls and data processing remain in-region"
EU quote from https://www.workato.com/product-hub/changelog/workato-ai-features-now-available-in-eu-data-center/ (Oct 2025), which adds "existing recipes continue on US models". Hedge 'where possible' vs 'remain in-region' differs between pages. EU city/cloud provider not named
Not used for training: "AI by Workato doesn't use user data for training purposes."
Statement is on the AI by Workato connector page; Genie-specific docs (FAQ, data page) do not address training
Genies use skills built from Workato recipes and app connectors, MCP servers; chat via Slack and Microsoft Teams; Agent Studio Developer API
Slack and Teams support follows the Agent Studio documentation.
Listed by provider: ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, PCI-DSS v4.0.1 Level 1 (QSA), IRAP (PROTECTED), NIST 800-171A r2 (C3PAO); SOC reports under NDA
Company-level scope; confirm Genie-specific coverage. SOC reports are attestations.
Files capped at 25MB, video not supported; knowledge search returns top 10 documents in 8,000-character chunks; semantic search weak on JSON/CSV; "LLMs can make arithmetic errors"; skill responses capped at 250 KB; "Genies requiring Business approvals can't process autonomous tasks"
AI by Workato not available in CN data center
Agentforce Salesforce · Platform
Documents, Workflow & Agents Salesforce’s platform to build and run AI agents inside Salesforce, priced by consumption, by conversation or per user.
Three models side by si… ● Only third-party model … ● Conditions apply – open for details Agentforce
Salesforce · Platform
Facts, sources and conditions Salesforce’s platform to build and run AI agents inside Salesforce, priced by consumption, by conversation or per user.
Where it sits on the map · 1 · 3 Companies whose customer and sales data already live in Salesforce.
ETHORITY analysis
Three models side by side: Flex Credits (consumption), per conversation, and per-user licence.
Flex Credits $500 per 100,000; conversations $2 each; Agentforce User License $5 per user per month for employee-facing agents (requires Flex Credits); add-ons $125 per user per month (Sales, Service, Field Service) and $150 (Industries); Agentforce 1 Editions from $550 per user per month; Foundations $0. Edition naming (“Max Edition”) and euro prices were shown on 17 Oct and are to be re-confirmed.
List prices for the named editions.
Only third-party model training is addressed
The statement covers third-party models. Ask how Salesforce's own models handle your data.
Runs on Salesforce CRM/Data 360 (Data 360 credits a separate cost); add-ons for Sales, Service, Field Service, Industries; channels for service agent: voice, web, portals, SMS, WhatsApp; Agent API and Agentforce Mobile SDK for external apps.
Pricing page: https://www.salesforce.com/agentforce/pricing/ ; service page: https://www.salesforce.com/service/ai/ ; Agent API: https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/ai/agentforce/guide/agent-api-considerations.html
Compliance portal lists for 'Agentforce & Einstein Platform': ISO/IEC 42001:2023 certificate ('Salesforce AI Platform, Agentforce Slack AI, ...', updated 1 Oct 2026); HDS certificate (Salesforce); SOC 1 bridge letter (Agentforce Operations). Full list (125 documents) refers to 'Audits and Certifications' section of the service SPARC.
Provider documentation; confirm the certificate scope and issuer. SOC reports are attestations.
Pricing: Agentforce User Licence gives 'Access to limited Salesforce CRM objects'; Flex Credits and per-conversation pricing cannot be used in the same org; unused Flex Credits do not roll over; editions include 'a limited number of generative credits'. Agent API: 120-second timeout; not supported for 'Agentforce (Default)' agent type.
Agent API constraints: https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/ai/agentforce/guide/agent-api-considerations.html. Service AI page: 'Includes a limited number of generative credits.' No accuracy/hallucination limitation statement found on reviewed pages.
AP Appian Agent Studio Appian · Platform
Documents, Workflow & Agents Agent Studio lets Appian designers configure AI agents that follow prompt instructions and call tools, MCP servers and Appian process models to route cases, update records and start workflows.
Per user/app/month ○ Conditions apply – open for details EU AWS regions ● Conditions apply – open for details AP Appian Agent Studio
Appian · Platform
Facts, sources and conditions Agent Studio lets Appian designers configure AI agents that follow prompt instructions and call tools, MCP servers and Appian process models to route cases, update records and start workflows.
Where it sits on the map · 1 · 1 Build governed AI agents inside low-code business processes
Task classification by ETHORITY; match it to your intended use.
"Priced per user, per month, per app"; tiers carry AI Action quotas (Standard 200K, Advanced 500K, Premium 1M AI Actions per month)
AI Agents listed only for Advanced and Premium tiers
AI Agents available in AWS Europe regions incl. Frankfurt (eu-central-1), Ireland, Paris, London, Zurich, Stockholm, Milan; not Spain (eu-south-2). Data "remains within your designated region unless you explicitly configure cross-region processing using inference profiles"
Appian GPT models (GPT 5.4/5.5) documented as US/GovCloud only; region statement from https://docs.appian.com/suite/help/26.3/security-compliance.html
Not used for training: "Appian does not use your data to train or improve underlying AI models."
Where the provider's own sources disagree The provider’s own sources say different things here. Source conflict: Private AI page (https://docs.appian.com/suite/help/26.8/private-ai.html) also says 'Your data is only used to train your models and those models are never shared' (customer-specific models, e.g. AI skills) vs 'No data is used to train models'
Agent tools access data, trigger processes and call other agents; "MCP tools let agents interact with third-party systems without custom integrations"
no connector count stated
Appian Cloud: ISO/IEC 27001:2022; ISO 27017:2015; ISO 27018:2019; SOC 1 Type II/ISAE 3402, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, SOC 2 C5 Type II (attestations by independent audit firm, C5:2020); PCI DSS (external auditor); FedRAMP Moderate/High ATO; DISA IL2/4/5 PA; GovRAMP Moderate; Cyber Essentials/Plus; ENS (Spain); ISO 9001:2015 (Appian Engineering)
Issuers/auditors not named in text (only a Coalfire logo filename); not registry-verified. AI doc states AI capabilities 'inherit these certifications' (https://docs.appian.com/suite/help/26.3/security-compliance.html). HIPAA/GxP/21 CFR Part 11 are compliance/alignment claims, not certifications
"AI agents involve LLM calls and tool execution, which introduce latency"; "Reliability depends on prompt quality, tool configuration, and the complexity of the reasoning required"; agents exceeding resource limits are stopped automatically; up to five parallel tool calls per reasoning step
Pricing page footnote: some features 'may not be available or may have limited functionality in self-managed deployments' (https://appian.com/products/pricing)
BA Beam AI Beam AI · Platform
Documents, Workflow & Agents Beam AI runs enterprise AI agents on graph-based workflows that mix fixed steps with LLM nodes, pausing at consent nodes for human approval and drawing on 1,500+ prebuilt connectors.
Per contract · monthly ○ Conditions apply – open for details EEA · US · AU/NZ ● Sources disagree – open for details BA Beam AI
Beam AI · Platform
Facts, sources and conditions Beam AI runs enterprise AI agents on graph-based workflows that mix fixed steps with LLM nodes, pausing at consent nodes for human approval and drawing on 1,500+ prebuilt connectors.
Description follows the provider's agentic-automation page.
Where it sits on the map · 1 · 1 Build and run workflow-based AI agents for back-office processes
Task classification by ETHORITY; match it to your intended use.
Terms: "The ongoing fees are billed in advance by calendar month, unless otherwise agreed"; pricing units set in individual Contract Form
No public pricing page found; unit itself not published
Data security annex: hosting on AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud; regions EEA, United States, Australia/New Zealand; customer data hosted in region tied to the customer's Beam account; AI inference in matching region "where regional processing is available and configured"
Documented by the provider 20 Oct 2026 beam.ai ↗ Where the provider's own sources disagree The provider’s own sources say different things here. Contradiction: privacy policy s.4.3 says "Our servers are located in Europe" (https://beam.ai/legal/privacy-policy); /platform says "Beam is hosted in the EU"; homepage lists "EU data residency". Specific cloud regions (e.g. Frankfurt) not named
Not used for training: customer data "is never used to train generalized AI or machine-learning models"
Documented by the provider 20 Oct 2026 beam.ai ↗ Consistent with data-security page (inputs/outputs not used to train shared or public models) and Agent OS page "Data sent to LLMs is not used for training." Terms s.6.4 permit anonymised aggregated analytics from customer data for product enhancement
"1500+ pre-built connectors" incl. SAP, Oracle, Salesforce, Workday; /platform names Airtable, Aircall, ServiceNow, Copper, Asana, Sage, ClickUp; MCP and A2A protocols for external agent platforms
Count from https://beam.ai/platform/agentic-automation and agent-os
Provider claims only: homepage "SOC 2 Type II certified and GDPR compliant"; /platform "With ISO 27001 and SOC Type II certifications". No auditor, scope or report period published on pages read
Where the provider's own sources disagree The provider’s own sources say different things here. SOC 2 is an attestation, not a certification; GDPR is a law. Inconsistent across own pages: agentic-automation page says only "SOC 2 compliant, GDPR ready"; data-security page names no ISO/SOC report. Not registry-verified. HIPAA, NYC LL144 bias audit also listed on homepage
Terms s.10.2: "All information on the Services shall not constitute a guarantee for the quality of the Services" unless expressly agreed; s.8.5 puts risk that Applications meet requirements on the customer
Contractual disclaimer only; no product-specific limitations stated on pages read
Documents, Workflow & Agents Lindy is a credit-billed AI teammate set up in plain sentences that works across 1,500+ connected apps from Slack, email, iMessage and phone, holding outbound actions for approval.
Per user/mo + credits ○ Conditions apply – open for details Not used for training: … ○ Conditions apply – open for details Facts, sources and conditions Lindy is a credit-billed AI teammate set up in plain sentences that works across 1,500+ connected apps from Slack, email, iMessage and phone, holding outbound actions for approval.
Where it sits on the map · 1 · 1 Delegate recurring business tasks to a no-code AI agent
Task classification by ETHORITY; match it to your intended use.
Per active user per month, each with monthly credits; shared workspace credit pool; top-ups $10 per 1,000 credits
docs: 'You pay per user, and everyone on the workspace shares one pool of credits'; $0.01 per credit on base plans (https://docs.lindy.ai/pricing)
Free $0 ($50 in credits, 7 days); Team $49.99/user/month with 5,000 credits; Enterprise custom
Unit: USD Where the provider's own sources disagree The provider’s own sources say different things here. Source conflict: pricing page metadata says 'Starts at $29.99 per user per month'; docs (https://docs.lindy.ai/pricing) name plans Plus, Pro, Max + Enterprise vs Free/Team/Enterprise on pricing page
Not used for training: "Your data is encrypted, never sold, and never used to train models."
Security page: 'Lindy and our providers do not use your data to train AI models' (https://www.lindy.ai/security)
"1,500+ integrations + MCP"; channels Slack, email, iMessage, Chrome extension (Gmail), phone calls
Unit: count 1,500+ Pipedream named as integrations sub-processor in privacy notice
SOC 2 Type II (attestation), "audited by Johanson Group"
Page labels it 'SOC 2 Type II Certified' (https://www.lindy.ai/security); HIPAA, GDPR, PIPEDA are laws, shown as 'Compliant'/'independently verified' — not certifications. Not registry-verified
"If the pool runs low, Lindy pauses credit-using actions"; plan credits do not roll over; free credits last 7 days; confirmation toggle only for actions with 'side effects'
confirmation scope from https://docs.lindy.ai/testing/human-in-the-loop
NA Nanonets Nanonets · Product
Documents, Workflow & Agents Nanonets extracts fields and tables from invoices, forms and scans via configurable workflows billed per block run, routing rule-violating files to reviewers before export to ERPs, databases or sheets.
Per run · no seats ○ Conditions apply – open for details US · EU · APAC (Ent.) ○ Sources disagree – open for details NA Nanonets
Nanonets · Product
Facts, sources and conditions Nanonets extracts fields and tables from invoices, forms and scans via configurable workflows billed per block run, routing rule-violating files to reviewers before export to ERPs, databases or sheets.
The provider’s data-extraction and pricing pages give additional scope and billing information. https://nanonets.com/data-extraction https://nanonets.com/pricing
Where it sits on the map · 1 · 1 Extract structured data from business documents into downstream systems
Task classification by ETHORITY; match it to your intended use.
Per block run on prepaid credits: Simple operations $0.02/run, Standard AI $0.10/run, Complex AI (data extraction, generative AI) $0.30/run; "No platform fees. No seat licenses."
Provider example: typical invoice workflow runs 4-6 blocks per document
Starter: "$50 in credits to start", no card required, then "$100/month for 100 credits"; block runs $0.02 / $0.10 / $0.30; Growth and Enterprise on quote
Unit: USD Where the provider's own sources disagree The provider’s own sources say different things here. The Starter page describes both $100 for 100 credits and per-run dollar rates; confirm how the two charges relate.
Enterprise plan lists "data residency (US, EU, APAC)"; privacy policy: "Our servers are located in the United States, the EU, and India"
Where the provider's own sources disagree The provider’s own sources say different things here. Contradiction: security policy states "All customer data is stored in the USA" (https://legal.nanonets.com/security-policy); sub-processor page lists all 18 sub-processors in USA. EU region/city not named. Privacy quote from https://legal.nanonets.com/privacy
Email import, cloud storage connectors, API; exports to Google Sheets, QuickBooks, Google Docs, PostgreSQL, MySQL, MSSQL, Python script; Growth: ERP and database integrations; Enterprise: Salesforce, SAP, Oracle connectors, SIEM
Export list from https://docs.nanonets.com/docs/how-to-setup-your-workflow
Provider claim: "Nanonets is SOC 2 compliant and ISO/IEC 27001 certified"; SOC 2 Type I and Type II reports on request under NDA; auditor, scope and period not named
SOC 2 is an attestation; GDPR/HIPAA (claimed on data-extraction page, HIPAA listed as Enterprise feature) are laws. ISO issuer not named; not registry-verified
Handwriting "must be legible to the human eye"; "Results may vary depending on writing style, image clarity, and document structure"; Starter limited to 3 users
User limit from https://nanonets.com/pricing
Documents, Workflow & Agents Rossum captures data from invoices, purchase orders and bills of lading using its in-house transactional LLM Aurora, holding fields below confidence thresholds for human validation before export to SAP or Coupa.
Annual · by volume ○ EU default (AWS) ○ Sources disagree – open for details Facts, sources and conditions Rossum captures data from invoices, purchase orders and bills of lading using its in-house transactional LLM Aurora, holding fields below confidence thresholds for human validation before export to SAP or Coupa.
Aurora and confidence-threshold behaviour are described on the provider’s Aurora page. https://rossum.ai/aurora-advanced-ai/
Where it sits on the map · 1 · 1 Automate transactional document capture for AP and order processing
Task classification by ETHORITY; match it to your intended use.
Annual plans "based on the volume of pages or documents you process" and workflow complexity; overage per additional page; minimum contract one year
Starter "Starting at $18,000 per year"; Business, Enterprise, Ultimate: quote
Unit: USD per year included volumes not stated
AWS; EU default for new customers: primary eu-central-1 (Frankfurt), backup eu-west-1 (Ireland), or Ireland primary/Frankfurt backup; US and Japan regions also offered
Where the provider's own sources disagree The provider’s own sources say different things here. Source conflict: same page's 'Data Processing and Transfers' section lists EU, Ireland and Czech Republic, not matching region list. Enterprise plan lists 'Preferred cloud location' (https://rossum.ai/pricing/)
SAP, Coupa, Workday "and more"; logos NetSuite, Xero, Microsoft Dynamics, QuickBooks; API access, webhooks
no count; webhooks/API from https://rossum.ai/pricing/
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (third-party certified, issuer not named); ISO/IEC 42001:2023; SOC 2 Type II attestation (period 15 Jun 2024–24 Jun 2025); TX-RAMP Level 1 (certificate ID TX1114698)
Where the provider's own sources disagree The provider’s own sources say different things here. Source conflict: pricing FAQ (https://rossum.ai/pricing/) lists HIPAA among 'ISO 27001, SOC2, HIPAA, TX-RAMP' — HIPAA is a law and not on security page. Not registry-verified. Trust Center (https://trust.rossum.ai/)
Confidence-threshold feature "is deprecated"; "estimating this accuracy correctly in all cases is still an unsolved problem"; trade-off between automation and manual review; one-year minimum contract
Provider-stated claims only: 'average accuracy of 92.5%' (Aurora page); 'Up to 66% error reduction' (transactional page)
Documents, Workflow & Agents According to Doxis (formerly Klippa): “Doxis’ solution leverages AI to analyze the pixel-level structure of documents in the metadata to detect fraud.”
Annual or per document ○ Conditions apply – open for details EU default (Amsterdam) ○ Sources disagree – open for details DF Doxis AI.dp
Doxis (formerly Klippa) · Product
Facts, sources and conditions According to Doxis (formerly Klippa): “Doxis’ solution leverages AI to analyze the pixel-level structure of documents in the metadata to detect fraud.”
Where it sits on the map · 1 · 1 Detect tampered or forged documents in screening and onboarding
Task classification by ETHORITY; match it to your intended use.
Annual licences or pay-per-document; platform: pay-as-you-go with credit top-ups and monthly invoicing; enterprise on request
Pay-as-you-go/credits from https://www.klippa.com/en/dochorizon/platform/
"Servers are in Amsterdam by default"; sub-processor list: Microsoft Azure West Europe (Amsterdam), Google Cloud and AWS within the EEA; custom server location "possible in any location worldwide"
Where the provider's own sources disagree The provider’s own sources say different things here. Inconsistent: fraud-detection page says EU-hosted, document-checking and AI-agent pages say servers "located in Europe and the US". Sub-processor page last updated 24 May 2023 (https://help.klippa.com/en/article/list-of-sub-processors-dochorizon-1cvij7c/)
Email, mobile capture, API, SFTP, SDKs; "over 200 third-party integrations"; named: Dynamics 365, NetSuite, QuickBooks, SAP, Xero, Zoho Books, Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive, SharePoint; output JSON, XML, PDF, CSV; cross-checks against third-party databases
Where the provider's own sources disagree The provider’s own sources say different things here. Count inconsistent: platform page cites 50+ integrations (https://www.klippa.com/en/dochorizon/platform/)
Provider claims: ISO 27001 (press release July 2023, no version, issuer, scope or validity given), ISO 9001, ISAE 3000 Type I
ISAE 3000 is an assurance report, not a certification; GDPR/CCPA are laws. ISO 9001 listed in platform FAQ but not in logo section. Issuer unknown; not registry-verified
"Doxis supports all Latin-based languages, with additional languages available on request"; platform provided "as is"; Doxis not responsible for accuracy of processed data, which depends on uploaded data quality
Disclaimers from https://www.klippa.com/en/dochorizon/terms-and-conditions/; no fraud-detection-specific limitations stated
IN Instabase AI Hub Instabase · Platform
Documents, Workflow & Agents According to Instabase: “Instabase can classify files, discern intent, and even split multi-document packets into individual files.”
Sub-processors AWS, Goo… ● Conditions apply – open for details Used unless you opt out… ● Conditions apply – open for details IN Instabase AI Hub
Instabase · Platform
Facts, sources and conditions According to Instabase: “Instabase can classify files, discern intent, and even split multi-document packets into individual files.”
The original product page was inaccessible. Confirm the current product scope against the applicable documentation or contract.
Where it sits on the map · 1 · 1 Classify, split and extract data from complex document packets
Task classification by ETHORITY; match it to your intended use.
Sub-processors AWS, Google, Microsoft listed with locations "United States, European Union, and United Kingdom"; OpenAI "United States, European Union"; pricing lists "multi-region replication and failover"
No customer-selectable EU region or city stated on pages read; trust page and privacy doc silent on region
Used unless you opt out: LLM providers "won't use your data to improve their models"; "Users of certain paid plans have the option of opting-out" of content used to improve services
Implies Instabase may use content to improve services unless opted out (paid plans / written exception via privacy@instabase.com)
Storage: AWS S3, Azure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage, SharePoint Online; mailbox connections; LLM endpoints OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, AWS Bedrock; Google Vision (enterprise); API and SDK
Mailbox connection referenced via navigation link only
Provider claim: "Instabase holds certifications and attestations for SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA"; "renewed annually by independent bodies"; auditor and period not named
SOC 2 is an attestation; HIPAA, GDPR and CCPA are laws.
Files "up to 50MB"; legacy mode digitization "supported only for languages that use Latin characters"; audit logs in private preview for Enterprise single-tenant only
50MB from https://instabase.com/pricing/; audit-log scope from https://docs.instabase.com/admin/audit-logs
