ETHORITY®METHODS AND FRAMEWORKS
Use the right lens for the question.
Market curation, readiness, trust and realised value ask different questions. A framework makes a decision inspectable; naming it does not establish certification or empirical validation.
Next step: talk to Sten Franke
Bring your question. Together you agree the next step and its scope.
ETHORITY Trust Framework
Seven named pillars: performance, fairness, robustness, explainability, safety, sustainability and compliance. These identify dimensions to examine; this page calculates no trust score.
AI3M Maturity Model · EAITF
Named ETHORITY methods. A framework manuscript describes a designed method, rather than a validated tool, external standard or certification.
Readiness and maturity
The Readiness Check uses its own seven maturity pillars: strategy and leadership; use cases and value; data and technology; people and skills; governance and risk; trust and ethics; operations and scaling. These are distinct from the Trust Framework pillars.
Read the full assessment scope →Prism curation and research
Resolve the provider and offering before comparison. Retain sources, dates, product scope, contradictions and missing fields. Editorial inclusion, provider material, research admission and independent verification establish different things. Payment cannot buy a favourable finding or rank.
Inspect the research method →Capacity Conversion V2.1
Keep conversion stage, benefit class, claim-level evidence and management decision separate. A saved hour needs a destination and an outcome acceptor before it supports a business-value claim.
Inspect the method and blank record →Research Factory
A research question leads to a source register, a bounded method, an evidence synthesis and an editorial review. Preserve the original claim, distinguish interpretation and track corrections. Planned studies carry questions and methods, with no findings claimed before data. The Saved Hours synthesis keeps task, worker, workflow, enterprise and economic evidence separate.