ETHORITY®Start with attribution
A source identifies who made a statement and, where available, its edition and date. External research and provider documentation retain their original role and limitations. A source brief is not an ETHORITY original study, and a citation does not establish agreement, partnership or endorsement.
Keep dates meaningful
An original publication date belongs to the original item. A review or update date describes our edition. Unknown dates remain unknown. Historical archive entries are not silently refreshed into current facts; readers should inspect the linked source for its context and present availability.
Label the state of the work
A protocol describes a proposed method; a synthetic example rehearses a situation; an observed result describes what was actually recorded under stated conditions. A finding needs a source, method and limitations. Customer results require authorised evidence. We do not replace missing information with a positive conclusion.
Send a specific correction
Contact ETHORITY with the page URL, the disputed statement, the source or edition you believe should be considered, and a short explanation. Leave confidential information out of the public enquiry. A request begins review; it is not an automatic content or customer-data mutation.
Make a material revision traceable
A substantive correction should identify the affected statement and edition, state the revised basis, and connect the change to relevant derivatives. Minor copy changes and material factual revisions have different significance. A source that disappears or changes should be recorded as an access or evidence limit rather than treated as fresh support.
Media rights are separate
A link or bibliographic reference does not grant image, quotation, republication or training rights. Historical media and internal review assets require their own clearance for the intended use. Contact ETHORITY for current cleared material rather than copying an uncleared pack.