What it is used for Agentic end-to-end test automation
Connects with CI/CD: Google Cloud Build, Jenkins, Bamboo, Azure DevOps, GitHub (app + Action), GitLab, Octopus Deploy, CircleCI, Bitbucket (link only), deployment-events API; Jira/Atlassian Rovo, Slack; MCP Server (IDEs, Cursor, CLI)
How it is billed credits for cloud test runs (“starting point of 500 credits per month”); “local test runs are free”; quote-based
Where data is stored No – “All customer data is stored in the United States.”
Does it train AI on your data? Not used for training – “Neither mabl nor our service partner, Google Cloud, use customer data for training these models.”
Data-security article separately says technical environment info is used “to improve the mabl app”
Certificates and audit reports SOC 2 Type II (“mabl is SOC 2 Type II certified”); “adheres to SSAE16 / ISAE 3402 Type II standards”
SOC 2 is an attestation; confirm report scope and auditor.
Additional data conditions Subprocessors and underlying models GenAI “built on top of Google Cloud's enterprise AI tools”; specific models not named; data at rest keys via Google Cloud KMS
Via MCP server the user's own AI client model can also see mabl data
Retention and deletion Test run data kept “13 months, in active workspaces”; definitions until deleted (30-day recovery); deleted workspace data kept 30 days
Retention of data sent to LLMs not addressed
Product-specific conditions Deployment SaaS (“a cloud-native application”; “Parallel cloud execution … no infrastructure to manage”); local test runs
No on-prem/VPC option found
Organisation fit “Built for enterprise engineering organizations”; “scales from one team to the whole org”; pricing for “both large and small teams”; SSO/SAML, RBAC
signals only
Trial “mabl offers a 14-day free trial”
Ask the provider for the price, billing unit and required commitment for your scope. Ask the provider which retention and deletion terms apply, including when the contract ends. Areas, data and technology What the source marks mean Each mark shows what kind of source backs a fact. Open the fact to read the source, the date it was checked and any conditions.
The provider's own documentation supports this fact, for the product, plan and date stated.
The provider says this, for example on a marketing page. Read the linked source and its conditions before you rely on it. ETHORITY's assessment, based on the linked sources.
An independent source supports this one fact, within the scope stated. Check the other facts separately. Figures marked 'Scenario' are calculated from stated assumptions. Results measured in practice are shown separately.
Each source supports its recorded scope. Documentation depth and independent verification are separate.
How we research → AI DECISION BRIEF
A written comparison of up to three AI offerings · €195 net You get the facts that matter for your decision, each with its source, the questions to ask each vendor and a cost estimate based on your own numbers. First you agree your three most important criteria with Sten Franke.
We deliver your brief by email within a maximum of five working days after payment is confirmed and we have agreed the question and minimum information needed to begin. ETHORITY confirms the start date and delivery date and delivers earlier when the reviewed brief is ready. Missing optional information is recorded and assessed; it does not require you to research the solution yourself. Review before delivery and email support are included.
Your decision question The buttons open an email draft you can edit before sending. You agree the work and timing directly with Sten Franke.
ETHORITY®