innoGPT · Platform
The model list and SharePoint/Drive integrations are described on separate provider pages. https://www.innogpt.de/en/models https://www.innogpt.de/en/integrations.
Derived from homepage, pricing and integrations pages.
The provider’s own sources say different things here. Count '1,000+' stated; integrations page also says '+ 1,000 more integrations available' beneath 16 logos (wording inconsistency). Mechanism behind the 1,000+ figure not described.
Trial limits from https://www.innogpt.de/en/pricing; integration account limit from https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/5584558-integrationen; SCIM from https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/3370697-nutzerverwaltung-mitglieder-rollen-berechtigungen; '(most)' from security page.
SSO add-on and § 203 from pricing page. No technical/browser requirements stated.
Yearly billing gives one month free. Premium model usage weighted by model; top-ups EUR 5 to 1,000 one-time.
Prices excl. VAT. Page metadata also mentions a Personal plan from EUR 19, details not shown.
The provider’s own sources say different things here. CONTRADICTION/ambiguity: pricing page § 203 plan says 'EU hosting in Berlin' while footer and security page name AWS Frankfurt. Models page (https://www.innogpt.de/en/models) tags several models 'Global' (e.g. gemini-3-pro-preview, sonar-pro, llama-4-maverick) without defining location. Trust centre (https://trust.innogpt.de) states no hosting region.
Quote: 'Neither we nor our technology partners (like Microsoft) ever use your inputs or the generated outputs to train AI models.' Pricing page: 'No data used for model training'; § 203 plan: 'Contractual guarantee: no model training on your data.'
Homepage says 'Independently audited information security management' without naming auditor. Not third-party verified. GDPR listed alongside is a law, not a certification.
Only 5 of 31 sub-processors shown without expanding; DPA/TOMs documents marked NDA. Model list from https://www.innogpt.de/en/models. Own MCP servers can be connected; own API keys not mentioned.
Member deletion from https://docs.innogpt.de/de/articles/3370697-nutzerverwaltung-mitglieder-rollen-berechtigungen; sync lifecycle from integrations doc. No default retention period stated.
No account/chat data export found on homepage, security, pricing, user-management doc.
Security page describes only EU cloud hosting; self-hosting appears only on pricing page Enterprise tier.
Signals only; mid-market to enterprise quote from homepage.
Quote: 'Try free for 7 days'; 'During trial, only standard models are available.'
UI language setting not explicitly stated.
Connections use per-user OAuth; SharePoint supports sync or live search. Confirm permission checks at query time.
Editable hypothetical example · not provider pricing or measured performance. Use this monthly worksheet to test your own quote and quality assumptions.
/ accepted outcome
accepted outcomes / month
5,000 tasks × 80% = 4,000 accepted outcomes per month. Higher entered costs raise unit cost; more accepted outcomes spread the same cost over more results.
Formula: entered monthly costs ÷ (monthly tasks × acceptance % ÷ 100). The numerator includes only the costs you enter. Add applicable licence, usage, integration, human review and rework costs yourself; this is not automatically a fully loaded estimate or a vendor billing model. Capacity released is not realized financial value.
Inputs stay in this browser tab’s session, including reload and language changes. They are not added to the page URL. Continuing prepares an unsent enquiry draft.
Each mark shows what kind of source backs a fact. Open the fact to read the source, the date it was checked and any conditions.
Figures marked 'Scenario' are calculated from stated assumptions. Results measured in practice are shown separately.
Each source supports its recorded scope. Documentation depth and independent verification are separate.
AI DECISION BRIEF
You get the facts that matter for your decision, each with its source, the questions to ask each vendor and a cost estimate based on your own numbers. First you agree your three most important criteria with Sten Franke.
We deliver your brief by email within a maximum of five working days after payment is confirmed and we have agreed the question and minimum information needed to begin. ETHORITY confirms the start date and delivery date and delivers earlier when the reviewed brief is ready. Missing optional information is recorded and assessed; it does not require you to research the solution yourself. Review before delivery and email support are included.
The buttons open an email draft you can edit before sending. You agree the work and timing directly with Sten Franke.